Registration Red Tape and Preplanning in Question
← Back to Article ArchiveTBG SA Daily Energy and Solar brief
Registration Red Tape and Preplanning in Question
Eskom’s three recent changes to Small-Scale Embedded Generation (SSEG) registration – sign off by Department of Labour registered professionals, reduced compliance barriers, and exemption of fees for most households until March 2026, are intended to streamline solar grid connections and remove financial obstacles for residential and small business customers. For direct Eskom users, the registration process is now easier, more affordable, and aimed at accelerating legal rooftop PV adoption.
Yet, a key obstacle remains for corporate and management teams in most corporate and commercial sites: municipalities have not followed Eskom’s lead. While Eskom promotes urgent SSEG registration and compliance as a precondition for grid participation, most local councils still operate with outdated or conflicting standards, leaving municipal electricity users in limbo. The result is widespread policy confusion, administrative bottlenecks, and the real threat of legal rooftop solar adoption stalling for years. OUTA and Afriforum are pushing hard for national alignment, warning that businesses and households’ risk being caught in an endless loop of red tape or exposed to penalties for delay. As the pressure for clarity mounts, industry leaders must monitor municipal engagement closely to safeguard planning, compliance, and future energy cost savings.
Over the last week, Eskom reported nearly 9,600MW in unplanned outages. Despite a claimed year-on-year reduction (2.81%, or 1,201MW), doubts persist whether this marks real progress or selective data use. Persistent grid reliability challenges remain a priority concern for business operations and strategic risk assessment.
Eskom’s plan to deploy 7.2 million smart meters over three years is drawing parliamentary criticism. There’s still NO budget, NO product, NO plan. The first smart meters in KZN (Msunduzi, Ward 23) are being rolled out in areas with neither high levels of electricity theft nor large indigent populations, despite stated project goals. Senior executive Collin Reddy claims the approach will reduce load reduction (load shedding in a different name), expanded access to free basic electricity for indigent households and they will allow Eskom to identify when power is being used but not paid for. Critics argue meters should instead be prioritised for neighbourhoods most affected by theft and poverty and NOT Ward 23 for example, to deliver real value and impact. This raises concerns about accountability and strategic focus.
Sources: Eskom, OUTA, PV Magazine, ITWeb, DFA, Sanews, The South African, GovernmentZA